Oil Storage Terminal In Birżebbuġa Refused
05.14.2018 - NEWS

May 14, 2018 [Time Of Malta] - Plans for a new oil storage terminal in Birżebbuġa have been turned down by the Planning Authority after years circling the drain.


The PA board on Thursday unanimously rejected the application, which had met with strong opposition from residents and the Birżebbuġa local council.

Applicant Yush M Sultan Al Junaidy had been seeking since 2010 to build a land-based oil storage terminal along jetties for large vessels, connecting pipe-lines, workshops, storage, offices and control rooms.

The facility would have taken up an area of nearly 125,000 square metres fronting Triq Kalafrana, on good quality arable land adjacent to the Freeport.

The local council had insisted Birżebbuġa could not absorb the impact of another oil terminal, noting that the effects of the existing facility nearby, and also the Freeport, had already been substantial.

Architect Carmel Cacopardo, representing the local council on the board on Thursday, took the PA to task for the “deplorable” eight-year delay in deciding the application and reiterated that increased development in the area would have a negative impact on residents.

The application had been stalled for about two years before yesterday’s decision because, under the Marsaxlokk Bay local plan, no development can be allowed in the area until a recreational site in Ħal Far was secured and a study was carried out on the need for warehousing space in the area.

The application had been heading for a refusal on the basis that it was premature. However, according to the PA case officer, the applicant had opted not to withdraw the plans due to ongoing litigation over the land.

The PA had also indicated at an early stage of processing that a master plan would be required to assess the proposal alongside a now-withdrawn application for an adjacent storage and distribution facility in light of the area’s present and future needs.

The PA case officer said a draft action plan was prepared but found to be unsatisfactory.

Moreover, no studies were ever carried out, as required by the Seveso Directive, on the possibility of harmful impact on the environment and safety of the area and its people.

The developers gave no further feedback to the PA after April 2016, despite indicating they would be proceeding with the application, and were not present on Thursday as the application was given the thumbs-down.

—————————-

TankTerminals.com – Research, Market and Expand Your Presence within the Tank Storage Industry Learn more.

10-year Treasury yield hovers close to highest level since April as investors await key jobs data
01.10.2025 - NEWS
U.S. Treasury yields hovered close to its highest level since April on Friday, as investo... Read More
Union dockworkers, port employers announce tentative deal at East Coast and Gulf ports
01.09.2025 - NEWS
State of Freight The tentative agreement is on all items for a new six-year mas... Read More
China's property market is expected to stabilize in 2025 — but stay subdued for years
10.30.2024 - NEWS
China’s struggling real estate sector may not start turning around until the sec... Read More
Harris will offer an alternative to Trump-era politics in closing argument speech
10.29.2024 - NEWS
1234534234 Democratic presidential nominee U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris walks to bo... Read More